Author
Listed:
- Elena Fregonara
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Francesca Thiebat
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Chiara Senatore
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Mónica Alexandra Muñoz Veloza
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Alice Masoero
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Roberto Giordano
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
- Diego G. Ferrando
(Architecture and Design Department, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)
Abstract
This paper builds on research from a project aimed at promoting the circular economy through processes based on low-impact materials derived from natural fibers. A methodology is developed to assess the economic, environmental, and social sustainability of alternative production scenarios, thereby supporting the ranking of options. Assuming the principles of Life Cycle Thinking and circular economy and the operational aspects of Life Cycle Costing (LCC), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) approaches normed by international standards, an integrated approach is proposed based on the construction of a joint Global Cost indicator. Attention is paid to harmonizing impacts assessed in their own units of measurement to arrive at a monetary indicator for summarizing and simplifying the prioritization of alternatives. As a result, the integrated Global Cost calculation methodology is presented to internalize social and environmental impacts, as well as economic ones, and to evaluate the sustainability of materials derived from primary and waste natural fibers.
Suggested Citation
Elena Fregonara & Francesca Thiebat & Chiara Senatore & Mónica Alexandra Muñoz Veloza & Alice Masoero & Roberto Giordano & Diego G. Ferrando, 2026.
"A Methodology for Evaluating Economic–Environmental–Social Sustainability,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2290-:d:1873210
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2290-:d:1873210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.