Author
Listed:
- Usanee Danklang
(Technology of Information System Management Division, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)
- Adisorn Leelasantitham
(Technology of Information System Management Division, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)
Abstract
This study examined the psychology-driven decision-making dynamics of Millennial solo travellers in Asia, with a comparative focus on Thai and other Asian tourists. While the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is widely applied in tourism research, prior studies may not fully address the attitude-mediated construct–intention gap, stage-based intention–behaviour variation, and post-intention outcomes. To extend this perspective, the study proposes the I-SMART Cognitive TPB Model, integrating temporal bias, loss aversion, narrative-driven information, Social Exchange Theory, the four-stage tourism life cycle, and post-intention marketing behaviours. Survey data from 800 respondents (400 Thai, 400 Asian) were analysed using structural equation modelling. The findings indicate that narrative information may play a stronger role in shaping attitudes among Asian travellers, whereas Thai travellers appear more influenced by time-based motivation. Pre-trip factors emerged as key contributors to intention formation in both groups, while post-intention patterns diverged: intention linked more strongly to satisfaction among Asian travellers and to revisit tendencies among Thai travellers. Theoretically, the study offers an integrated cognitive–behavioural model that complements TPB by incorporating bias-driven and stage-based mechanisms. Practically, the findings provide guidance for designing digital infrastructure, time-sensitive policies, and storytelling-driven marketing strategies tailored to Millennial solo travellers.
Suggested Citation
Usanee Danklang & Adisorn Leelasantitham, 2026.
"The Tourist Life Cycle in Millennial Solo Travel: The Roles of Bias and Narrative Information in Thailand and Asia,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-40, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2265-:d:1872502
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2265-:d:1872502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.