Author
Listed:
- Sasiwimol Khawkomol
(Department of Irrigation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand)
- Jutithep Vongphet
(Department of Irrigation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand)
Abstract
Thailand’s goal of becoming carbon-neutral by 2050 and producing no emissions by 2065 requires their reliable renewable energy means to be expanded upon quickly. Biomass is an important resource for this. Even though there are many biomass power plants in Thailand, the further expansion of biomass energy is being held back by several problems, such as unclear rules and feedstock instability, which is worsening because of climate change. This study formulates an investor-focused Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to rank the policy instruments that bolstered investor confidence in 2024–2025. Expert opinions were gathered through a Delphi-validated process and examined via eigenvector-based weighting and consistency checks. The findings indicate that law and regulatory policy is the most successful intervention (0.31), followed by economic incentives (0.24) and R&D support (0.18). Sub-criteria analysis reveals that regulatory clarity and the stability of feedstock supply—aggravated by climate-induced yield risks—are the predominant factors influencing investment decisions. Sensitivity analysis substantiates this ranking, indicating that fundamental regulatory reform is necessary to realize the full efficacy of financial or technological incentives. These results provide policymakers with a clear method to make decisions about how to align biomass roadmaps with the needs of the private sector. This will help emerging economies make a smooth and long-lasting transition to clean energy.
Suggested Citation
Sasiwimol Khawkomol & Jutithep Vongphet, 2026.
"Investor-Centric Policy Prioritization for Biomass Energy in Thailand: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Decision-Support Model,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2224-:d:1871370
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2224-:d:1871370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.