IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2202-d1871030.html

Integrating Lean Six Sigma with Sustainability Goals in Saudi Food Processing: A Case Study Using a Quantitative Framework for Measuring Sustainability Contributions and Cultural Enablers

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulrahman Mohammed Albar

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 82817, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yazeed A. Alsharedah

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 52541, Saudi Arabia)

  • Osama M. Irfan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia)

  • Walid Mahmoud Shewakh

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan 82817, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

In recent years, the food processing industry in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) has faced increasing pressures to improve operational efficiency while improving its environmental performance. This research examines whether Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodologies can be used as tools to incorporate sustainability into current operational processes at a date processing facility in Saudi Arabia. In addition to illustrating the ways in which production was improved, this research developed and preliminarily validated a Sustainability Integration Index (SII) framework to measure the contributions of improvement projects to sustainable practices in terms of their impact on the environment, society, and economy. Furthermore, this research examined the role of organizational culture as a moderator of the effectiveness of integrated LSS–sustainability approaches using a Cultural Readiness Assessment Model (CRAM). This research addressed production bottlenecks and aligned production with selected United Nation Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) using the Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control (DMAIC) methodology. Production bottlenecked in packaging operations resulted in schedule overruns and excessive overtime; therefore, the intervention focused on improving the production process in these areas. There were three distinct improvement streams: demand-based resource leveling, advanced production planning to allow for pull-based flow, and targeted maintenance to raise Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) from 48.2% to 74.6%. Results indicated a 23% increase in daily processing capacity, a 38 min decrease in the average length of time of production closures, and estimated annual cost savings of 940,000 SAR (approximately USD 250,000). The SII framework showed a 21.2% improvement in sustainability scores, with a total composite score improvement from 0.66 to 0.80. Social sustainability had the greatest relative increase (+24.2%). Exploratory correlation analysis found that improvements in cultural maturity and cross-functional collaboration are possible predictors of successful sustainability integration; however, the limitations of the single case study limit the ability to draw causal inferences. The results provide both empirical evidence and possible measurement tools to an under-explored area: the use of LSS in Middle Eastern food processing industries with specific sustainability goals. Validation of the frameworks across different industries will be necessary to establish generalizability.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulrahman Mohammed Albar & Yazeed A. Alsharedah & Osama M. Irfan & Walid Mahmoud Shewakh, 2026. "Integrating Lean Six Sigma with Sustainability Goals in Saudi Food Processing: A Case Study Using a Quantitative Framework for Measuring Sustainability Contributions and Cultural Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2202-:d:1871030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2202-:d:1871030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.