IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2198-d1871023.html

Life Cycle Assessment of Fresh-Cut Salad Packaging: Evaluating Conventional vs. Bio-Based Films Under Current Waste Management Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Mauro Moresi

    (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

This study presents a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of packaging for 1000 kg of fresh-cut salad using conventional polypropylene (PP) and bio-based INZEA ® FH05 bags. Using the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) methodology, the analysis revealed weighted scores of 152 ± 14 mPt for PP and 158 ± 14 mPt for the bioplastic. To distinguish between statistical significance and practical relevance, a Monte Carlo Analysis (MCA) was performed. Statistical significance was defined by the probability P(PP ≥ INZEA ® ), representing the frequency of iterations where the PP impact was greater than or equal to the bioplastic, while practical relevance was assessed by the percentage difference (Δ) between mean values. The MCA demonstrates that the PP system is the environmentally preferable option in 91.5% of the simulated iterations; correspondingly, there is only an 8.5% probability (P) that PP results in a higher impact than the bioplastic. Despite this high frequency of preference, the overall tangible benefit remains modest, with a 4.1% reduction (Δ) in the total PEF score for PP. At the characterization level, bioplastic films showed a robust advantage in fossil resource depletion (P = 96.2%; Δ = +4.7% for PP); however, this was offset by significantly higher impacts in categories such as Acidification (P = 0%; Δ = −11.0%) and Freshwater Ecotoxicity (P = 0%; Δ = −29.7%). Conversely, the Climate Change category showed environmental parity with no tangible benefit (Δ = −0.5%) and a lack of statistical significance (P = 43%). These findings indicate that the theoretical benefits of compostability are currently hindered by industrial infrastructural deficiencies. Under current scenarios, PP maintains a competitive environmental profile, highlighting that a successful transition to bioplastics requires both material innovation and systemic improvements in waste management infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauro Moresi, 2026. "Life Cycle Assessment of Fresh-Cut Salad Packaging: Evaluating Conventional vs. Bio-Based Films Under Current Waste Management Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2198-:d:1871023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2198-:d:1871023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.