Author
Abstract
This study examines how consumers’ perceptions of corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance are statistically associated with sustainable relational outcomes within a structured cognitive and relational framework. Drawing on signaling theory and perceived value theory, we propose and empirically test a sequential mediation model in which perceived ESG performance is positively associated with perceived sustainability awareness (PSA), PSA subsequently is associated with dual-path value perceptions (cognitive and socio-emotional value), and these value perceptions are positively related to long-term trust (LTT) and value co-creation (VCC). In addition, the moderating role of signal credibility on the ESG–PSA relationship is examined. Using survey data from 278 South Korean consumers and structural equation modeling, the results indicate that perceived ESG performance is significantly positively associated with PSA, which in turn is positively associated with both cognitive and socio-emotional value. These value dimensions independently and positively relate to long-term trust, which is in turn associated with value co-creation. Contrary to expectations derived from signaling theory, signal credibility does not significantly moderate the ESG–PSA relationship, suggesting that ESG signals may function as baseline legitimacy cues within the South Korean institutional context, where sustainability norms are relatively institutionalized. Overall, the findings suggest that ESG effectiveness does not operate through direct persuasion but is consistent with a multi-stage cognitive and relational framework. By distinguishing sustainability awareness from ESG perception and decomposing value perceptions into dual paths, this study advances theoretical understanding of how ESG signals may be internalized and statistically linked to sustainable firm–consumer relationships. From a managerial perspective, the results highlight the strategic importance of designing ESG initiatives and communications that enhance sustainability awareness and support long-term trust as foundations for engagement and co-creation. Given the cross-sectional design, the proposed sequential structure should be interpreted as associative rather than definitive causal evidence.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2179-:d:1870471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.