Author
Listed:
- Junfeng Xu
(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)
- Yilei Li
(Graduate School, Xi’an International Studies University, Xi’an 710128, China)
- Shanshan Shao
(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)
- Xigang Ke
(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)
Abstract
Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals requires intangible cultural heritage (ICH) policies that safeguard living heritage while enabling inclusive participation, capacity building, responsible use, and resilience. We introduce a reproducible, text-as-data framework that links semantic-agenda discovery to mechanism-level policy diagnosis by coupling BERTopic with the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index. Using a corpus of 26 national-level Chinese ICH policies, BERTopic reconstructs agenda structure and stage-wise shifts; PMC operationalizes sustainable governance through nine primary dimensions and 45 binary indicators to test whether policies encode long-horizon, monitorable, and feedback-enabled governance loops. The agenda is dominated by inventory-based listing and key-item safeguarding, then expands toward standardization, implementation coordination, and communication/participation, and recently pivots toward resource allocation and performance governance. Policy design quality is moderate (mean PMC = 6.15; 8 Good, 14 Average, 4 Poor). Strengths concentrate on stated goals, instrument mixes, and implementation arrangements, whereas recurrent gaps cluster in time institutionalization (timelines, milestones, rolling revision), legal-institutional enforceability, and operational monitoring-evaluation-feedback provisions. We translate these bottlenecks into an SDG-aligned upgrading pathway that hardens temporal targets, binds evaluation to budgets and accountability, and codifies participation rights and risk boundaries, enabling ICH safeguarding to shift from project-style action to sustainable, cross-cycle governance.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2177-:d:1870440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.