IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p2115-d1868680.html

Exploring the Ecological Security Network in the Gansu Section of the Yellow River Basin in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohan Yang

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Hong Tang

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Chongjian Yang

    (College of Grassland Agricultural Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Lei Han

    (College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has led to severe landscape fragmentation and ecosystem degradation in the Gansu Section of the Yellow River Basin (GSYRB). Focusing on this region, this study identified the spatial distribution of key ecological elements; consequently, an integrated “source–corridor–pinch point” ecological network was constructed. The findings aim to optimize the regional ecological security pattern. Ultimately, this study provides a scientific basis for the sustainable development of the study area and similar regions. This study revealed ecological trends based on four periods of land use data (1993–2023). We identified ecological source areas through MSPA and ecosystem service evaluations, and constructed resistance surfaces using spatial PCA. By applying circuit theory, we extracted ecological corridors—incorporating width attributes—and identified pinch points, thereby establishing a comprehensive ecological network. The results show that: (1) Over the past 30 years, construction land area expanded significantly, while cultivated land and water body areas contracted, and grassland and forest areas increased slowly. (2) Both the landscape fragmentation index and connectivity index exhibited a downward trend, while the landscape diversity index decreased first and then increased, indicating a systemic transformation in the landscape pattern. (3) A total of 260 ecological source areas, 694 ecological corridors (linear pathways connecting ecological source areas), and 371 ecological pinch points (critical bottleneck sections within corridors where connectivity is most vulnerable to disruption) were identified, forming an overall network structure with uneven spatial distribution. The ecological network spatial pattern constructed in this study based on ecosystem service assessment and circuit theory can effectively identify key ecological elements and their spatial heterogeneity characteristics, providing scientific reference for optimizing regional ecological security patterns and biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohan Yang & Hong Tang & Chongjian Yang & Lei Han, 2026. "Exploring the Ecological Security Network in the Gansu Section of the Yellow River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2115-:d:1868680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2115-:d:1868680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.