Author
Listed:
- Wendy M. Purcell
(Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)
- Andrew Schmidt
(Quality of Life Initiative (UN-Habitat), Nairobi 30470, Kenya)
- Elizabeth Sitati
(Quality of Life Initiative (UN-Habitat), Nairobi 30470, Kenya)
- Himanshu Shekhar
(Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University, 53113 Bonn, Germany)
- David Dodman
(Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3063 ND Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
- Francesco Sarracino
(STATEC, L-4401 Belval, Luxembourg)
- Jamie Anderson
(School of Environment, Education, and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)
- Marija De Wijn
(Quality of Life Initiative (UN-Habitat), Nairobi 30470, Kenya)
- Eduardo Moreno
(Quality of Life Initiative (UN-Habitat), Nairobi 30470, Kenya)
Abstract
Given the lack of integrated, cross-cutting approaches in urban Quality of Life measures, a new framework is proposed here that draws upon a city-level index co-created under the Quality of Life Initiative implemented by UN-Habitat. Using a conceptual narrative review with a systematic structure, themes relevant to the urban context were clustered into three areas or ‘lenses’ through which decision-making in development and policy might be viewed, namely: Structural (i.e., adequacy, affordability, objective safety), Fairness (i.e., equity, inclusion, opportunity), and Perception (i.e., belonging, perceived safety, meaning and purpose). In support of creating sustainable communities, structural foundations and needs, such as housing, transport, food, and infrastructure, typically need to be addressed first. These structural realities are then filtered through a fairness lens—who benefits, who participates, and who is left behind? Finally, the filtered urban experience culminates in perception-level outcomes in terms of how people feel, connect, and find meaning in their urban experience. While presented sequentially in the framework, this is not prescriptive. Cities may start with any one lens dependent upon the context of the sustainable development challenge they are seeking to address while still recognizing the dynamic tensions among the lenses. The power of the framework lies in moving beyond siloed thinking to examine interconnections and intersectionality. To explore the potential practical application of the framework it was applied to three key urban Quality of Life challenges, namely, informality, migration, and sustainability. The framework is offered as an adaptable tool for policymakers and practitioners to support the design of more equitable, inclusive, and meaningful urban development interventions that support delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals and the global agenda to leave no one behind.
Suggested Citation
Wendy M. Purcell & Andrew Schmidt & Elizabeth Sitati & Himanshu Shekhar & David Dodman & Francesco Sarracino & Jamie Anderson & Marija De Wijn & Eduardo Moreno, 2026.
"Adopting a Quality-of-Life Approach to Urban Development: Proposing a New Framework Based on Structural, Fairness, and Perception Lenses,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-24, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2102-:d:1868426
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2102-:d:1868426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.