IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p2076-d1867649.html

Digital Adoption of Generative AI Tools: A Multi-Theory Model Linking Cognitive Load, User Perceptions, and System Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Salem Suhluli

    (Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business, Jazan University, Jazan 82511, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of “(GenAI)” Generative Artificial Intelligence systems has reshaped everyday activities, yet their adoption remains uneven and cognitively demanding for many users. Existing research has largely relied on conventional technology acceptance models, providing limited insight into cognitive burden and GenAI-specific system characteristics. To address this gap, this study develops an integrated framework combining the Technology Acceptance Model, Cognitive Load Theory, and the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model to explain GenAI adoption among ordinary users. Survey data from 1001 active GenAI users were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that all core technology acceptance relationships are statistically significant ( p < 0.001), while mental load negatively affects perceived usefulness and user attitudes. Moreover, GenAI system attributes—output quality, transparency, friction reduction, and system integration—significantly moderate key adoption pathways and strengthen the translation of behavioral intention into actual use. Predictive assessment indicates that the proposed model outperforms the baseline technology acceptance model, with stronger explanatory power and superior out-of-sample predictive performance (Q 2 predict > 0.35). The findings offer actionable insights for designing cognitively efficient, trustworthy, and sustainable GenAI systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Salem Suhluli, 2026. "Digital Adoption of Generative AI Tools: A Multi-Theory Model Linking Cognitive Load, User Perceptions, and System Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2076-:d:1867649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2076-:d:1867649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.