Author
Listed:
- Shuying Bai
(Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)
- Yue Wang
(Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)
Abstract
Against the backdrop of intertwined individualization, urbanization, and digitalization, the demographic heterogeneity within urban communities continues to increase. How to foster resident participation has become a crucial issue for achieving sustainable urban development. Using empirical data from the city of Harbin and employing stepwise multiple regression analysis, this study examines the mechanisms through which perceived benefits, technological empowerment, and community identity influence resident participation. The findings indicate the following: First, perceived benefits and technological empowerment not only directly promote resident participation but also exert a significant indirect influence by enhancing community identity. Second, there exists an asymmetric interaction effect between perceived benefits and technological empowerment, where community identity is shown to be synergistically promoted, but residents’ participation is directly inhibited. This reveals the dual role of digital technology in community settings, simultaneously strengthening emotional bonds and substituting for physical involvement. Third, community identity acts as a pivotal mediating mechanism in the interaction between instrumental and value-based rationality. In essence, resident participation is shaped by the ongoing, technology-mediated interplay and negotiation between these two rationalities. Building on this, the study proposes a dual cycle model of digital participation to integrate these nonlinear relationships. It emphasizes that community participation is not a linear causal process but a dynamically evolving system shaped by the mutual construction of social psychology and technological context. The conclusions provide a theoretical framework that is both explanatory and practical for community governance in the digital era.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2061-:d:1867085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.