IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p2055-d1866967.html

Practice and Feasibility of Energy Harvesting Technologies in Civil Infrastructure: A Comparative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Rauf Shaker

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT 06516, USA)

  • Purnachandra Rao Eluri

    (Structural Assessment Division, Consor Engineers, Rocky Hill, CT 06067, USA)

  • Frezer Ayele

    (Structural Assessment Division, Consor Engineers, Rocky Hill, CT 06067, USA)

  • Byungik Chang

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT 06516, USA)

Abstract

Energy harvesting is an emerging approach that supports the generation of renewable and clean energy, while also augmenting the durability and stability of infrastructure. The paper aims to review applicable energy harvesting systems deployed in various types of infrastructure, including roads and bridges, for applications such as photovoltaic noise barriers, photovoltaic cells, piezoelectric devices, and thermoelectric units. The harvested energy can be utilized to generate electricity, power wireless sensors, melt ice, and provide heating or cooling, while also assisting in monitoring structural conditions. Each energy harvesting technology is described in detail, covering operational principles, application scenarios, prototype development, and key findings from the literature. Economic feasibility studies are also examined to allow for a comparative assessment of energy output, production costs, and cost-effectiveness. This review provides a comparative feasibility framework integrating energy performance, levelized cost of electricity, payback period, and technology readiness levels for infrastructure-based energy harvesting systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Rauf Shaker & Purnachandra Rao Eluri & Frezer Ayele & Byungik Chang, 2026. "Practice and Feasibility of Energy Harvesting Technologies in Civil Infrastructure: A Comparative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2055-:d:1866967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2055/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2055/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2055-:d:1866967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.