Author
Listed:
- Kensuke Kobayashi
(Faculty of Bioresource Sciences, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima 727-0023, Japan)
- Hiroshi Mikawa
(Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan)
- Ryosei Kajitani
(Faculty of Bioresource Sciences, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima 727-0023, Japan)
- Hanae Yazawa
(Faculty of Bioresource Sciences, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima 727-0023, Japan)
- Yoshiyuki Suzuki
(Technical Research Institute, Decarbonization Technology Development Department, HAZAMA ANDO CORPORATION, Ibaraki 305-0822, Japan)
- Yosuke Tanaka
(Building Construction Division, Project Management Department, HAZAMA ANDO CORPORATION, Tokyo 105-7360, Japan)
Abstract
The building sector has a significant environmental impact throughout the life cycle of a building. Reducing the environmental load of the building sector is essential for creating a sustainable society. Many current reports focus on carbon emission, while other environmental impacts remain insufficiently evaluated. Furthermore, buildings serve different functions depending on the region, and the types and quantities of primary materials used vary accordingly. Under these circumstances, little research has focused specifically on Japan. This study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) covering the life cycle of material inputs (structural and finishing materials) for 95 buildings in Japan. In addition to greenhouse gas emissions, multi-criteria analysis, including characterization and integration (characterization such as acidification, ozone layer destruction, and photochemical ozone; damage assessment; and integration using LIME2 and LIME3), was conducted. Based on analyses of numerous buildings, the objectives were to clarify trends in environmental impact emissions by building use, conduct an environmental impact analysis that could serve as a future benchmark, and discuss for reducing these environmental impacts. First, the analysis of trends such as maximum, median, and minimum values across six building types revealed that the environmental impact per square meter tended to be lower for production and logistics facilities and higher for offices, government buildings, schools, hospitals, hotels, and condominiums across many indicators. However, significant variations were observed between individual buildings within each category. These results can serve as a benchmark for the environmental impact of future buildings in Japan. Next, GHG emissions and integration (LIME2, LIME3) were quantitatively identified for materials with high emissions, and the factors were considered. Furthermore, processes with high environmental impacts associated with the material were analyzed and identified. Ready-mixed concrete, reinforcing bars, and steel frames showed high values across quantitative indicators, whereas wood and other materials varied by indicator. Finally, based on these findings, perspectives for reducing the environmental impact of key materials are proposed for each stakeholder group.
Suggested Citation
Kensuke Kobayashi & Hiroshi Mikawa & Ryosei Kajitani & Hanae Yazawa & Yoshiyuki Suzuki & Yosuke Tanaka, 2026.
"Reducing Environmental Impact of Buildings Based on Actual Building Analyses: A Multi-Criteria Study of Frame and Finish Materials,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-31, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2045-:d:1866780
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2045-:d:1866780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.