IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p2041-d1866683.html

Exploring Urban Sky Gardens’ Spatial Patterns, Influencing Factors and Optimizing Strategies in Lanzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Pengzhen Du

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Qiyu Chen

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jinyu Xin

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Shibo Ma

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Urban sky gardens—elevated green spaces on buildings, encompassing rooftop gardens and podium gardens—are critical to the improvement of urban ecosystem services and functions. Understanding the spatial patterns and the influencing factors of sky gardens is essential for the precise allocation of elevated spaces in urban development. Taking the four central urban districts of Lanzhou in China as the study region, a GIS database of 508 sky gardens was established by identifying high-definition image maps and on-site investigations. The spatial patterns and influencing factors, such as building height, ground-level green area, and population density, were analyzed. The development of sky gardens was also compared in Lanzhou and Guangzhou, China. The distribution of sky gardens in Lanzhou exhibited spatial heterogeneity. Most sky gardens were distributed along the Yellow River. Chengguan District had more sky gardens than Xigu District. In terms of structural characteristics, 82% of sky gardens were rooftop gardens, 73% were located in residential buildings, and 63% were attached to mid- and low-rise buildings. Most sky gardens were one floor, characterized by no public accessibility, a location in high-density plots, and low vegetation coverage. Sky garden area was negatively correlated with building height, ground-level green area, and green plot ratio in sky gardens. There were positive associations between sky garden area and higher plot ratio, building density, and population density based on Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression. Due to the proper climate conditions and economy, Guangzhou had more sky gardens than Lanzhou. Our study suggests that the utilization of rooftops and podiums is relatively low, and the development of sky gardens exhibits spatial clustering. A suite of optimizing strategies should be implemented to enhance the accessibility and usability of sky gardens.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengzhen Du & Qiyu Chen & Jinyu Xin & Shibo Ma, 2026. "Exploring Urban Sky Gardens’ Spatial Patterns, Influencing Factors and Optimizing Strategies in Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2041-:d:1866683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2041-:d:1866683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.