IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p2021-d1866224.html

Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration and Multi-Level Community Participation Centred on the Provision of Non-Material Ecological Products Can Effectively Reconcile Strict Protection in Protected Areas with Local Community Development

Author

Listed:
  • Hanyun Zhang

    (China Institute for Vitalizing Border Areas and Enriching the People, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yue Chen

    (College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kaifu Zhao

    (Yunnan Digital Forestry Planning and Design Co., Ltd., Kunming 650032, China)

  • Weili Kou

    (College of Big Data and Intelligence Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
    Yunnan International Joint R&D Center (China–Malaysia) for Digital Monitoring, Management and Applications of Nature Reserves, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

The public-goods nature of ecological products and heterogeneous stakeholder interests mean that protected areas often face weak coordination, limited incentives, and uneven benefit distribution in the identification, transformation, and return of ecological value. Under increasingly strict conservation objectives, ecological product provision is shifting from direct resource use towards maintaining ecosystem functions and realising experiential value. This helps safeguard ecosystem integrity but raises demands on institutional pathways for value transformation and on the sustainability of community livelihoods. Using Pudacuo National Park in China as a case, this study develops an analytical framework linking supply–demand structures, value chains, and value co-creation, and applies policy document analysis, semi-structured interviews, field observation, and process tracing to examine mechanisms of ecological value realisation under strict conservation. The results show that: (1) a collaborative governance network integrating park authorities, local governments, and concession operators provides a stable organisational basis for ecological value identification and transformation; (2) strengthened provision of non-material ecological products reorients the supply system towards regulating and cultural services, driving a shift from material output to function- and experience-oriented provision; (3) a multi-level community participation model combines labour embedding, livelihood diversification, and institutionalised benefit return to form an ecological value return mechanism grounded in value co-creation. Together, these mechanisms support a relative balance between ecological protection and community development under strict protection and offer empirical insights into the institutional logic of ecological value realisation in strongly protected contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanyun Zhang & Yue Chen & Kaifu Zhao & Weili Kou, 2026. "Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration and Multi-Level Community Participation Centred on the Provision of Non-Material Ecological Products Can Effectively Reconcile Strict Protection in Protected Areas with Local Community Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2021-:d:1866224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2021/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/2021/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2021-:d:1866224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.