Author
Listed:
- Martin Wynn
(The School of Business, Computing and Social Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 2RH, UK)
- Peter Jones
(The School of Business, Computing and Social Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham GL50 2RH, UK)
- Bilgin Metin
(Department of Management Information Systems, Bogazici University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey)
Abstract
The continuing development and deployment of nanotechnologies offer an extensive and seemingly continually expanding range of business opportunities, but these technologies can also generate potential challenges for a wide range of stakeholders. Although there appears to be a clear consensus on the potential of nanotechnologies, little has been published on how specific companies are tackling the challenges associated with their use. This study adopts an inductive, qualitative methodology based on an analysis of existing literature, company websites, and international standards, to address this gap in the research literature. The paper explores how some of the largest companies working with nanotechnologies publicly address these challenges through their corporate social responsibility (CSR) approaches and examines the extent to which nanotechnologies feature in these approaches to establish organizational trustworthiness. Building on these findings, and with reference to relevant international standards such as ISAE 3000 and ISO/IEC TS 5723, the article proposes an assurance-based framework to foster verifiable trustworthiness by assessing and managing the impact of nanotechnologies in the corporate environment and to guide corporate governance and regulatory compliance. This will be of interest and relevance to business practitioners and researchers as findings suggest that awareness of the potential impacts of nanotechnologies remains limited, as reflected in their scant recognition in many CSR policies and related activities.
Suggested Citation
Martin Wynn & Peter Jones & Bilgin Metin, 2026.
"Nanotechnology, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Sustainable Business Practice: Towards an Assurance-Based Risk Governance Framework,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-26, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2015-:d:1866106
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:2015-:d:1866106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.