IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1944-d1864178.html

Assessing Proxy-Based Grassland Gross Primary Productivity Using Machine Learning Approaches and Multi-Source Remote Sensing

Author

Listed:
  • Tsolmon Sodnomdavaa

    (Department of Finance and Economics, Mandakh University, Ulaanbaatar 16061, Mongolia)

Abstract

Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) in grassland ecosystems is a fundamental eco-biophysical indicator for assessing carbon cycling, grazing capacity, and ecosystem responses to climatic stress. However, robust estimation of GPP in arid and semi-arid rangelands remains challenging because of pronounced spatial heterogeneity, strong climate variability, and inherent uncertainties associated with remotely sensed observations. Together, these factors constrain both modeling performance and out-of-sample generalization beyond the training domain. In this dryland grassland context, this study compares the performance of machine learning (ML) models for grassland GPP proxy-based characterization, downscaling, and predictive agreement using a multivariate dataset that integrates Sentinel-2-derived spectral and phenological features, a Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived GPP proxy, and complementary climatic and geographic information. Pixel-level observations spanning multiple years are analyzed, with ordinary linear regression used as a baseline benchmark and ensemble decision-tree models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB), compared. Instead of relying solely on random cross-validation, model performance is systematically assessed using a combination of spatially structured validation and a leave-one-year-out scheme to explicitly examine spatial and temporal generalization. The results indicate that ensemble tree-based models outperform linear approaches, with the HGB model showing the strongest agreement with the MODIS-derived GPP proxy (R 2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.035 on the test set) and maintaining stable performance across spatial and temporal validations (R 2 = 0.86–0.96 across years). Taken together, the findings demonstrate that integrating multi-source remote sensing data with climatic information within a rigorous validation framework enables a more reliable assessment of model generalization and gap-filling consistency with respect to a remote-sensing-based proxy target, rather than an absolute validation against ground-based measurements, thereby supporting sustainability-relevant monitoring of arid grassland ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsolmon Sodnomdavaa, 2026. "Assessing Proxy-Based Grassland Gross Primary Productivity Using Machine Learning Approaches and Multi-Source Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1944-:d:1864178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1944-:d:1864178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.