Author
Listed:
- Fanxin Meng
(School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Haili Zhang
(School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Zongshan Zhao
(School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)
- Xiujun Liu
(School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)
- Xuliang Zhang
(School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)
- Zongjin Zhao
(School of International and Public Affairs, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)
- Hui Xue
(School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)
Abstract
Urban green spaces (UGS) play a critical role in enhancing urban resilience and livability by delivering a wide range of ecosystem services. Understanding residents’ preferences for urban green space ecosystem services (UGES) and their underlying drivers is essential for advancing human-centered and equitable UGS management. Existing studies have largely emphasized socio-demographic and contextual factors, while the role of personal values as deeper psychological drivers of UGES preferences remains insufficiently examined. Values are deeply rooted beliefs that shape cognition and behavior and, as such, provide a powerful theoretical lens for interpreting human–ecosystem interactions. Based on 1080 responses from a nationwide online survey, this study investigates how value orientations influence residents’ preferences for UGES in China. The results show that personal values have significantly greater explanatory power for UGES preferences than demographic variables. Specifically, self-transcendence is positively associated with preferences for regulating and cultural services, whereas self-enhancement is positively associated with preferences for provisioning services. These patterns indicate that prosocial and egoistic value orientations underpin preferences for ecosystem services characterized by public versus individual benefits, respectively, suggesting that UGES preferences represent external expressions of individuals’ underlying value structures. The opposing value dimensions of conservation and openness to change both exert positive effects on preferences across all three UGES categories, indicating that UGES preferences are jointly shaped by pluralistic value systems. In the context of intergenerational value change and evolving societal expectations, UGS planning should therefore prioritize diversity and inclusivity. Overall, this study demonstrates the central role of value orientations in shaping residents’ UGES preferences and highlights the potential of integrating value-based perspectives to enhance preference-sensitive management and value-oriented governance of UGS.
Suggested Citation
Fanxin Meng & Haili Zhang & Zongshan Zhao & Xiujun Liu & Xuliang Zhang & Zongjin Zhao & Hui Xue, 2026.
"The Influence of Values on Preferences for Ecosystem Services in Urban Green Spaces: Evidence from Chinese Residents,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1834-:d:1862016
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1834-:d:1862016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.