IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1833-d1862002.html

Do Ecosystem Services Really Decline Under Urbanization? Long-Term Evidence from Seoul’s Green Infrastructure (1978–2025)

Author

Listed:
  • Wencelito Palis Hintural

    (Department of Forest Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, 1124, E10–1 Bldg., Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
    Urban Ecosystem Research Division, Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, College, Laguna 4031, Philippines)

  • Eunseon Heo

    (Department of Forest Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, 1124, E10–1 Bldg., Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea)

  • Soyeon Jeong

    (Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea)

  • Jinwoo Lim

    (Department of Forest Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, 1124, E10–1 Bldg., Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea)

  • Si Ho Han

    (Kasuya Research Forest, Kyushu University, Sasaguri, Fukuoka 8112415, Japan)

  • Byung Bae Park

    (Department of Forest Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, 1124, E10–1 Bldg., Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Urban green infrastructure is increasingly recognized as a core component of urban sustainability, providing regulating ecosystem services (ES) that support climate resilience, environmental quality, and long-term urban livability. However, empirical evidence on the long-term stability of ecosystem services (ES) in rapidly urbanizing cities remains limited. Despite widespread assumptions that urbanization inevitably leads to irreversible ecological decline, few studies have quantitatively examined whether ES can persist, or even recover, over multi-decadal time horizons relevant to sustainable urban development. This study investigates the long-term trajectories of eight urban ES in Seoul, South Korea, across nearly five decades (1978–2025) and eight congressional districts, providing one of the longest temporal assessments of urban ES in East Asia. Using i-Tree Canopy and high-resolution aerial imagery across four benchmark years (1978, 1989, 2010, 2025), this study quantified standardized indicators for carbon sequestration (CSeq), avoided runoff (AVRO), and removal of six atmospheric pollutants (O 3 , NO 2 , SO 2 , CO, PM 10 , PM 2.5 ). Paired-sample t -tests and Cohen’s dz (effect size) were used to assess within-district temporal shifts and the magnitude of ecological change. Results reveal a pronounced period of early ecological stress during rapid industrialization (1978–1989), with negative standardized effect sizes across all services (dz between −0.65 and −0.72). However, these early losses were not sustained. Structural services such as CSeq and AVRO exhibited long-term functional stability, with effect sizes converging toward zero and the 1978–2025 change in CSeq showing no statistical difference ( p = 0.784). Pollutant removal services followed an early-decline–followed-by-recovery trajectory, exemplified by CO removal shifting from a large early decline (dz = −0.72) to a modest positive effect in later decades dz = 0.31). These findings indicate that Seoul’s sustained urban greening and environmental policies were effective in preventing further deterioration and maintaining core ecological functions, even if they produced stabilization rather than significant long-term gains in ES delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Wencelito Palis Hintural & Eunseon Heo & Soyeon Jeong & Jinwoo Lim & Si Ho Han & Byung Bae Park, 2026. "Do Ecosystem Services Really Decline Under Urbanization? Long-Term Evidence from Seoul’s Green Infrastructure (1978–2025)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1833-:d:1862002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1833/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1833/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1833-:d:1862002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.