Author
Listed:
- Ima-Sumac Sánchez de Céspedes
(Agrobiodiversity and Food Security Research Group-GIASSA, Agricultural and Environmental Science Faculty, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-21 y Gral. José María Córdova, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador
Doctoral Programme in Agriculture and Environment for Development, Campus Terra, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain)
- Jhadyra Anahí Chagna Aguirre
(Agrobiodiversity and Food Security Research Group-GIASSA, Agricultural and Environmental Science Faculty, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-21 y Gral. José María Córdova, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador)
- María Angélica Morales Males
(Agrobiodiversity and Food Security Research Group-GIASSA, Agricultural and Environmental Science Faculty, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-21 y Gral. José María Córdova, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador)
- Mónica Eulalia León-Espinoza
(Agrobiodiversity and Food Security Research Group-GIASSA, Agricultural and Environmental Science Faculty, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-21 y Gral. José María Córdova, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador)
- Doris Chalampuente-Flores
(Agrobiodiversity and Food Security Research Group-GIASSA, Agricultural and Environmental Science Faculty, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-21 y Gral. José María Córdova, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador)
- Julia K. Prado
(Agrobiodiversity and Food Security Research Group-GIASSA, Agricultural and Environmental Science Faculty, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Av. 17 de Julio 5-21 y Gral. José María Córdova, Ibarra 100105, Ecuador)
- Joaquín Giménez de Azcárate
(Department of Botany, Campus Terra, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain)
- Carmen Castillo Carrillo
(Santa Catalina Experimental Station, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Quito 170201, Ecuador)
Abstract
Agroecosystems comprise various components, including weeds, insects, and microorganisms, which interact with one another and play distinct roles in achieving sustainable agriculture. This balance is essential for both agricultural productivity and environmental preservation. This study explores the relationship between diversity and ecological functions of weed species and the entomofauna present in a pasture under rotational grazing and organic management in Otavalo, Ecuador. Sampling was conducted over an area of 2.5 hectares. We identified and counted weeds using 65 quadrats, each measuring 4 m 2 . To capture insects, we employed chromatic traps, pitfall traps, and entomological nets. The results indicated a medium level of biodiversity, as shown by the Margalef index (4.85) and the Shannon–Wiener index (2.23), which also suggested a medium to dispersed evenness (Pielou_J = 0.23). Additionally, the ecosystem exhibited low species dominance, indicated by the Simpson index (D = 0.20). In total, we recorded 55 species belonging to 24 different botanical families. The most abundant families were Fabaceae (39%), Poaceae (21%), and Plantaginaceae (14.6%). For the entomofauna, a rich community was identified, comprising twelve orders and fifty families, with the order Diptera being predominant. Crucially, these findings demonstrate that agroecological practices foster a significant presence and diversity of both weed plants and associated insects, contributing to the agroecosystem’s resilience. We emphasize the role of diverse weed flora as refuges and resource providers for beneficial insects, such as those from the highly abundant Tachinidae family (Diptera), which are key natural regulators. This research highlights the importance of integrating weed conservation into pasture management for enhancing biodiversity, natural pest regulation, and promoting sustainable local transformation in highland agricultural landscapes.
Suggested Citation
Ima-Sumac Sánchez de Céspedes & Jhadyra Anahí Chagna Aguirre & María Angélica Morales Males & Mónica Eulalia León-Espinoza & Doris Chalampuente-Flores & Julia K. Prado & Joaquín Giménez de Azcárate & , 2026.
"Weed Diversity and Associated Entomofauna in High-Andean Organic Pastures,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1828-:d:1861889
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1828-:d:1861889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.