Author
Listed:
- Roberto C. Pereira
(Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Feni Agostinho
(Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Arno P. Clasen
(Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Cecília M. V. B. Almeida
(Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
- Biagio F. Giannetti
(Post-Graduation Program in Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)
Abstract
Cultivated meat emerges as a promising alternative to conventional meat, the production of which causes significant environmental pressure, including greenhouse gas emissions, water demand, and pasture expansion, alongside ethical concerns related to animal slaughter. Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) often highlight reductions in these impacts for cultivated meat, but they typically adopt a technocentric perspective, omitting flows of renewable natural resources and human labor. In this context, emergy (with an “m”) environmental accounting offers a valuable methodological complement to LCA, incorporating biophysical and systemic perspectives for a more holistic analysis. The objective of this study is to apply emergy accounting to a cultivated meat production system. The results indicate that cultivated meat exhibits a Unit Emergy Value (UEV) of 0.43 × 10 13 sej/kg-meat, which is up to 13 times lower than that of conventional meat, thereby indicating a higher emergy efficiency. However, it still depends heavily on economic resources (71.1% of the total emergy). As a result, it presents low emergy yield (EYR of 1.41), high environmental load (ELR of 6.97), low renewability (12.5%), and an emergy sustainability index (ESI) of 0.20 (ESI < 1 denotes unsustainability), thus indicating that the system is unsustainable at its current technological stage. Compared to conventional livestock systems, particularly extensive systems with greater integration of natural resources, cultivated meat presents one of the poorest emergy performances due to its highly artificial energy and material basis, which is dependent on non-renewable resource inputs. These findings contrast with the optimistic conclusions from LCA studies, emphasizing the inferiority of cultivated meat in emergy terms and the need for complementary approaches to generate broader diagnostics. The analysis also identifies optimization opportunities, such as resource input substitution and the integration of renewables, aiming for greater sustainability in protein production.
Suggested Citation
Roberto C. Pereira & Feni Agostinho & Arno P. Clasen & Cecília M. V. B. Almeida & Biagio F. Giannetti, 2026.
"Ex Ante Emergy Synthesis of Cultivated Meat: Sustainability Insights and Benchmarks Against Conventional Systems,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1807-:d:1861530
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1807-:d:1861530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.