IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1792-d1861214.html

Does E-Waste Recycling Promote Environmental Quality in the EU? E-Waste Policy-Oriented Empirical Analysis for SDGs 12 and 13

Author

Listed:
  • Ender Baykut

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03300, Türkiye)

  • Serkan Göksu

    (Department of Insurance, Dinar School of Applied Sciences, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03300, Türkiye)

  • Abdullah Akcanlı

    (Department of Marketing and Advertising, Sandıklı Vocational School, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03300, Türkiye)

  • Mehmet Alper Şen

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Emirdağ Vocational School, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03300, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study tackles the issue using an innovative, multidimensional approach that considers economic indicators and the e-waste problem triggered by technological developments, while evaluating environmental sustainability. The original contribution lies in being the first study to examine e-waste recycling rates through the lens of the “load capacity curve hypothesis” (LCC h ). Empirical scrutiny of the top 10 European Union (EU) countries that generated the highest e-waste from 2007 to 2022 verified the validity of the LCC h . The “Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis” (EKC h ) is confirmed for Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions, but not Ecological Footprint (EF). Moreover, in lieu of e-waste density, elevated e-waste e-recycling rates have been shown to enhance the ecological structure. Empirical evidence suggests that prolonged use of e-devices, along with reduced waste and increased recycling rates, is essential for improving environmental quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ender Baykut & Serkan Göksu & Abdullah Akcanlı & Mehmet Alper Şen, 2026. "Does E-Waste Recycling Promote Environmental Quality in the EU? E-Waste Policy-Oriented Empirical Analysis for SDGs 12 and 13," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1792-:d:1861214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1792-:d:1861214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.