IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1779-d1860861.html

Assessing Nonlinear Effects of Landscape Patterns on Habitat Quality in the Yellow River Basin: An Integrated Framework Combining Interpretable Machine Learning and Spatial Autocorrelation

Author

Listed:
  • Faming Li

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Kaiting Yang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Tianming Sun

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Yuming Shao

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Yanhong Huo

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Yiqing Liu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)

Abstract

In the context of accelerating worldwide urbanization and ecosystem decline, deciphering the interactions between landscape patterns and habitat quality is essential for biodiversity preservation, particularly within ecologically sensitive zones like the Yellow River Basin. This research investigates the spatiotemporal dynamics, spatial linkages, and nonlinear relationships connecting landscape patterns and habitat quality across the basin. Utilizing land use datasets spanning 1980–2023, we combined the InVEST model, landscape pattern indices, spatial autocorrelation analysis, the XGBoost algorithm, and SHAP interpretability methods. The results show that: (1) Landscape patterns underwent a clear transition around 1995, shifting from regularization and connectivity toward fragmentation and heterogeneity, evidenced by increases in PD, LSI, and SHEI, alongside decreases in LPI and CONTAG. (2) Mean habitat quality progressively declined, exhibited a spatial distribution characterized by “higher in the west, lower in the east.” Low-quality habitat areas expanded from 2.12% to 3.76%, whereas high-quality areas decreased from 23.12% to 22.45%, with better habitats largely maintained in western headwaters and the Qinling Mountains. (3) Significant spatial correlations were observed: LPI positively correlated with habitat quality, while PD, LSI, SHEI, and CONTAG showed negative correlations. Two dominant spatial aggregations emerged—namely “high connectivity–high quality” in the west and “high fragmentation–low quality” in the east. (4) CONTAG was identified as the dominant factor influencing habitat quality, with all landscape indices exhibiting distinct threshold effects. The proposed framework, which integrates spatial statistics, machine learning, and interpretability methods, offers a novel approach for deciphering complex ecological processes. Moreover, the identified thresholds and zonal management strategies offer a scientific foundation for ecological conservation and spatial planning in the Yellow River Basin and other vulnerable river systems worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Faming Li & Kaiting Yang & Tianming Sun & Yuming Shao & Yanhong Huo & Yiqing Liu, 2026. "Assessing Nonlinear Effects of Landscape Patterns on Habitat Quality in the Yellow River Basin: An Integrated Framework Combining Interpretable Machine Learning and Spatial Autocorrelation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1779-:d:1860861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1779-:d:1860861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.