IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1772-d1860733.html

Utility-Based Evaluation of National Climate Policies: A Multi-Criteria Framework for Global Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Pavlova

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Volia Avenue 13, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine
    Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, A. Mickiewicza Avenue 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Oksana Liashenko

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Volia Avenue 13, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine
    Loughborough Business School, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Kostiantyn Pavlov

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Volia Avenue 13, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine)

  • Olga Demianiuk

    (B.D. Havrylyshyn Educational and Research Institute of International Relations, West Ukrainian National University, Lvivska Street, 11, 46009 Ternopil, Ukraine)

  • Yurii Vitkovskyi

    (Department of Management, Academy of Silesia, ul. Rolna 43, 40-555 Katowice, Poland)

  • Karolina Jakóbik

    (Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, A. Mickiewicza Avenue 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Zuzanna Piwowarczyk

    (Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, A. Mickiewicza Avenue 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Nataliia Karpinska

    (Institute of Administration and Political Science, University College of Professional Education in Wroclaw, Plac Powstancow Slaskich 1, 53-329 Wroclaw, Poland
    Law Faculty, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Volia Avenue 13, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine)

Abstract

Evaluating national climate policy performance requires frameworks that integrate multiple dimensions while accommodating diverse development pathways. This study develops a Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) framework to construct a Climate Policy Performance Index (CPPI) for 187 countries. The index integrates four dimensions—mitigation, adaptation, economic capacity, and governance—using explicit utility functions and policy-aligned weights derived from climate policy priorities. Results reveal substantial cross-national heterogeneity, with CPPI scores ranging from 33.67 (Turkmenistan) to 78.46 (Norway). Nordic countries lead with balanced excellence across dimensions, while alternative high-performance pathways emerge through mitigation leadership (Uruguay and Costa Rica) or governance–economy strength (Singapore). Regional analysis identifies Europe as the top-performing region, whereas Sub-Saharan Africa achieves unexpectedly high rankings despite low emissions owing to weak institutional capacity. The relationship between income and climate performance is non-monotonic: lower-middle-income countries achieve aggregate scores comparable to those of high-income nations, with near-perfect mitigation performance compensating for weaker governance. Sensitivity analysis shows that ranking robustness is comparable across equal, adaptation-focused, and multiplicative weighting schemes, whereas mitigation-focused weights yield substantially different orderings (ρ = 0.47). The CPPI correlates moderately with ND-GAIN (r = 0.40) and weakly and negatively with CO 2 per capita (r = −0.28), indicating that the framework captures distinct aspects of climate policy performance. The proposed methodology advances beyond existing indices by providing axiomatic foundations, transparent utility specifications, and comprehensive sensitivity analysis, offering a theoretically grounded tool for cross-national climate policy evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Pavlova & Oksana Liashenko & Kostiantyn Pavlov & Olga Demianiuk & Yurii Vitkovskyi & Karolina Jakóbik & Zuzanna Piwowarczyk & Nataliia Karpinska, 2026. "Utility-Based Evaluation of National Climate Policies: A Multi-Criteria Framework for Global Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-39, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1772-:d:1860733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1772-:d:1860733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.