Author
Listed:
- Gerardo Colín-García
(Campo Experimental Centro de Chiapas, Centro de Investigación Regional Pacífico Sur, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Ocozocoautla de Espinosa 29140, Chiapas, Mexico)
- Adolfo López-Pérez
(Posgrado en Hidrociencias, Campus Montecillo, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Texcoco 56264, Estado de Mexico, Mexico)
- Blanca Estela Santiago-Mejía
(Campo Experimental Río Bravo, Centro de Investigación Regional Noreste, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Río Bravo 88900, Tamaulipas, Mexico)
- Angel Saul Cruz-Ramírez
(Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Conservación y Mejoramiento de Ecosistemas Forestales, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Ciudad de Mexico 04010, Mexico)
- Madai Sánchez-Galindo
(Campo Experimental Cotaxtla, Centro de Investigación Regional Golfo Centro, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Medellín de Bravo 94270, Veracruz, Mexico)
- Eileen Salinas-Cruz
(Campo Experimental Centro de Chiapas, Centro de Investigación Regional Pacífico Sur, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Ocozocoautla de Espinosa 29140, Chiapas, Mexico)
Abstract
The availability of water resources has significantly decreased in recent years. Therefore, it is essential to design comprehensive management strategies at the watershed level. This study included a methodological novelty by combining morphometric analysis with multicriteria analysis to prioritize sub-watersheds in the Las Flores Watershed (LFW), located in Chiapas, Mexico. The LFW catchment area covers 2517.96 km 2 and was divided into 29 sub-watersheds. Morphometric analysis, based on physical characteristics (shape, stream network, and relief), allows us to infer the level of susceptibility to erosion of a watershed. However, to improve the prioritization of sub-watersheds, the erosion rate (EA) was estimated using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), as well as rainfall intensity and curve number. The results show that sub-watersheds SW 20 and SW 15 have the highest predicted EA values, that is, 234.76 and 222.10 t ha −1 , respectively. The final prioritization framework established that the sub-watersheds classified as very high priority were SW 20 , SW 28 , SW 15 , SW 21 , and SW 09 , covering an area of 734.19 km 2 , corresponding to 29.16% of the total area of LFW. Therefore, in these sub-watersheds, the immediate implementation of water regulation structures and conservation practices is required to minimize their susceptibility to water erosion.
Suggested Citation
Gerardo Colín-García & Adolfo López-Pérez & Blanca Estela Santiago-Mejía & Angel Saul Cruz-Ramírez & Madai Sánchez-Galindo & Eileen Salinas-Cruz, 2026.
"Watershed Prioritization Using Morphometric Parameters and Multicriteria Analysis in the Las Flores, Chiapas, Mexico,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-42, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1754-:d:1860437
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1754-:d:1860437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.