IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1735-d1859988.html

Sustainability as Structural Coherence Under Complex Market Dynamics: Evidence from the EU Sunflower Oilseed Value Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolae Istudor

    (Agri-Food and Environmental Economics Department, Faculty of Agri-Food and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marius Constantin

    (Agri-Food and Environmental Economics Department, Faculty of Agri-Food and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Raluca Ignat

    (Agri-Food and Environmental Economics Department, Faculty of Agri-Food and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Donatella Privitera

    (Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Via Teatro Greco 84, 95124 Catania, Italy)

  • Elena-Mădălina Deaconu

    (Agri-Food and Environmental Economics Department, Faculty of Agri-Food and Environmental Economics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Trade competitiveness can coexist with structurally fragile value chains. When chain feasibility fractures from trade competitiveness, competitiveness without coherence becomes sustainability’s opposite. This paper proposes revisiting the concept of sustainability in agri-food systems, through the lens of structural coherence, understood as the alignment between trade competitiveness, export-destination diversification, and value chain capacity. The research goal is to design and operationalize a diagnostic instrument for structural coherence testing through the triangulation of constant market share analysis (CMSA), the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), and physical structural input–output analysis (I-OA). CMSA measures two elements: demand- and competitiveness-driven export dynamics. Export patterns are further explored to verify if there are any destination-market concentration risks (HHI). I-OA closes the loop by linking trade outcomes to internal value chain capacity and efficiency. With clear upstream–downstream segmentation, the sunflower oilseed value chain of the European Union (EU) represents an empirically fertile ground, relevant in the context of the geopolitical disruptions of Black Sea trade corridors and double-cropping dynamics with food-fuel and land-use trade-offs. Focusing on Bulgaria, France, Hungary, Romania, and Spain, which collectively account for more than 85% of EU sunflower seed production, this paper benchmarks post-2013 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) programming effects, utilized as a proxy for a period of stability, against the post-2020 window, marked by a sequence of crises. Diagnosis is facilitated through findings triangulation, enabling deriving CAP-relevant policy recommendations, aligned with country-specific binding constraints. Results show heterogeneous structurally incoherent profiles: Bulgaria suffers from growth-induced stress, France’s chain efficiency is eroded, the Hungarian chain lacks competitiveness, Romania is raw-export dependent with value-added leakage, and Spain is structurally constrained by physical limits. Policy recommendations target reorienting market-driven low value-added trade behaviors toward structurally sustainable value chain trajectories.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae Istudor & Marius Constantin & Raluca Ignat & Donatella Privitera & Elena-Mădălina Deaconu, 2026. "Sustainability as Structural Coherence Under Complex Market Dynamics: Evidence from the EU Sunflower Oilseed Value Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-31, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1735-:d:1859988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1735-:d:1859988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.