IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i4p1713-d1859458.html

Methodological Solution for Sustainable Common Security Risk Management at the External Border

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Karklina-Admine

    (Institute of Governance and Security, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia
    National Customs Board, State Revenue Service, 1 Talejas Street, LV-1978 Riga, Latvia)

  • Aldis Cevers

    (Institute of Governance and Security, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Normunds Rudzitis

    (Institute of Governance and Security, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Arturs Gaveika

    (Centre for Economics and Governance, Rezekne Academy of Riga Technical University, 115 Atbrivosanas Aleja, LV-4601 Rezekne, Latvia)

  • Ligita Gasparėnienė

    (Faculty of Law, Vilnius University, Sauletikis av.g–1 Block, 10222 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Armands Auzins

    (Institute of Governance and Security, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

Several state institutions are involved in border security management, including border guards, customs services, veterinary and phytosanitary supervision, and other institutions whose areas of responsibility overlap at border control points. In this study, we found that most EU member states still use sectoral systems, with varying degrees of cooperation. The authors emphasise the importance of providing a unified (comprehensive, integrated, and sustainable) approach to border security risk management. The study focuses on the security risk management of the external border. The authors explore a feasible methodological solution and provide recommendations for improving border security and common risk management at the tactical (one-year) level, based on an analysis of scientific literature and practical work experience, as well as surveys and empirical considerations. Quantitative and qualitative research methods are employed in the study. The study’s main findings demonstrate how methodological solutions can support sustainable risk management and provide essential risk assessment techniques. The authors propose a 5-level matrix to assess the impact of external border security risks. National and international agencies can apply the study’s outcome to facilitate mutual collaboration and enhance sustainable, common security risk management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Karklina-Admine & Aldis Cevers & Normunds Rudzitis & Arturs Gaveika & Ligita Gasparėnienė & Armands Auzins, 2026. "Methodological Solution for Sustainable Common Security Risk Management at the External Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1713-:d:1859458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1713/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/4/1713/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:4:p:1713-:d:1859458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.