Author
Listed:
- Payam Rostamicheri
(Department of Finance, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo Campus, Nydalsveien 37, 0484 Oslo, Norway)
- Virgil Popescu
(Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania)
- Ramona Birau
(“Eugeniu Carada” Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania
Faculty of Economic Science, Constantin Brâncuși University of Târgu Jiu, 210185 Târgu Jiu, Romania)
- Iuliana Carmen Bărbăcioru
(Faculty of Engineering, Constantin Brâncuși University of Târgu Jiu, 210185 Târgu Jiu, Romania)
Abstract
This study investigates how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance influences firm-level financial outcomes using a panel of approximately 24,500 firm-year observations from 2015 to 2024, based on Refinitiv ESG scores across 12 industries and multiple European countries. To capture institutional heterogeneity, the analysis separates Nordic and non-Nordic firms and applies fixed-effects models for the latter and random-effects models for the former, as supported by Hausman diagnostics. The results reveal that ESG performance is positively associated with firm value, while its effects on short-run accounting returns differ across regions. Specifically, ESG scores are associated with a negative and statistically significant impact on ROA and ROE in the non-Nordic subsample, suggesting transitional adjustment costs and delayed financial realization. For financing outcomes, the study shows that ESG engagement reduces the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) in both samples, though mechanisms differ. In Nordic markets, a 10-point increase in ESG score corresponds to an estimated 4.2-basis-point reduction in WACC, reflecting the benefits of mature disclosure systems. In contrast, governance emerges as the only ESG pillar capable of reducing financing costs in non-Nordic countries. These region-specific patterns confirm that institutional maturity and investor orientation shape the financial materiality of ESG practices. The novelty of this study lies in jointly modeling (i) positive valuation effects, (ii) negative short-run profitability adjustments, and (iii) financing-cost reductions within a unified ESG framework while explicitly distinguishing governance regimes across Europe. The findings offer new evidence on how disclosure quality and governance structures moderate ESG’s economic impact and suggest that strengthening governance transparency can help firms in less mature ESG environments realize capital-cost advantages.
Suggested Citation
Payam Rostamicheri & Virgil Popescu & Ramona Birau & Iuliana Carmen Bărbăcioru, 2026.
"ESG Score and Firm Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Nordic and European Companies,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-30, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1707-:d:1859346
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1707-:d:1859346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.