IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1694-d1859092.html

Institutional Pressure and Seafarers’ Rights Protection: The Mediating Role of ESG Strategy in the Chinese Shipping Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Shouchao Zhu

    (School of Law, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116000, China)

  • Xingguo Cao

    (School of Law, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116000, China)

  • Bin Dong

    (School of Law, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116000, China)

  • Junghwan Choi

    (School of Law, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116000, China)

Abstract

Moving beyond passive legal compliance is a critical challenge for the global shipping industry in protecting seafarers’ rights. Drawing on interviews with 32 Chinese shipping executives, this study conceptualizes Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategy not merely as a disclosure tool, but as a critical “governance translation” mechanism. We propose a theoretical model where external accountability pressures drive the institutionalization of seafarers’ rights protection (SRP), mediated effectively by corporate ESG engagement. We find that this process is positively moderated by three boundary conditions: the localization of international conventions, the intensity of Port State Control (PSC) enforcement, and the maturity of organizational governance. Practically, the findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize the clear localization of international standards to reduce ambiguity. For managers, the study demonstrates that embedding SRP into board oversight and digital monitoring systems is essential for transforming labor rights from a cost center into a sustainable strategic advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Shouchao Zhu & Xingguo Cao & Bin Dong & Junghwan Choi, 2026. "Institutional Pressure and Seafarers’ Rights Protection: The Mediating Role of ESG Strategy in the Chinese Shipping Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1694-:d:1859092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1694-:d:1859092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.