Author
Listed:
- Xiaoyong Zhou
(School of Public Administration, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
College of Management, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China)
- Yingying Dong
(School of Public Administration, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
College of Management, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China)
- Zaozhuang Liao
(Department of Education of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530022, China)
- Zhengbo Peng
(School of Public Administration, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)
Abstract
Building resilient cities that can survive, adapt, and thrive amid climate and ecological challenges has become a global priority, yet achieving this goal requires adequate financial support. This study investigates the impact of green finance on urban ecological resilience (UER) by exploiting the establishment of China’s Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zones (GFPZs) as a policy shock. Using a DPSIR-based (driving force–pressure–state–impact–response) evaluation framework and a staggered difference-in-differences approach with panel data from 277 cities (2011–2022), the empirical results show that (1) the GFPZ policy significantly enhances UER; (2) green finance improves UER through three transmission channels—government environmental governance, green technological innovation, and public environmental participation; (3) the policy effects display clear spatial and structural heterogeneity, with stronger impacts in southern, less-developed, and non-traditional industrial cities, as well as positive local effects, negative spatial spillovers, and significant synergies with national big data pilot zones. This study clarifies how financial instruments contribute to building resilient cities and offers insights for embedding green finance into urban ecological strategies.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoyong Zhou & Yingying Dong & Zaozhuang Liao & Zhengbo Peng, 2026.
"Green Finance and Urban Ecological Resilience: Institutional, Technological, and Behavioral Mechanisms,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-35, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1691-:d:1859097
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1691-:d:1859097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.