Author
Listed:
- Wogiye Wube
(School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa University, King George IV Street, Addis Ababa 1000, Ethiopia)
- Eshetie Berhan
(School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa University, King George IV Street, Addis Ababa 1000, Ethiopia)
- Gezahegn Tesfaye
(School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology, Addis Ababa University, King George IV Street, Addis Ababa 1000, Ethiopia)
- Tsega Y. Melesse
(Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy)
- Pier Francesco Orrù
(Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy)
Abstract
Manufacturing industries are increasingly applying sustainable closed-loop supply chains (CLSCs) to meet economic, environmental, and societal goals. The increasing complexity and interdependence associated with the sustainability CLSCs make them highly vulnerable to disruption risks that threaten continuity and sustainability. However, prior studies fall short of guiding how disruption risks in sustainable CLSCs can be systematically prioritized under uncertainty in a stable and decision-relevant manner. To fill this literature void, this study develops a hybrid of the Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy-TOPSIS) method and the genetic algorithm (GA) technique to prioritize disruption risks under uncertainty. Triangular fuzzy numbers are used to capture the imprecision of 13 experts from industry and academia, whereas the GA technique used aimed to improve stability and reduce the variability commonly observed in conventional fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. The method is validated through a real-world case study, identifying supplier disruption risk, route disruption risk, and industrial accidents as the most critical risks. Moreover, sensitivity analysis is conducted to validate the robustness of GA-based Fuzzy-TOPSIS, demonstrating its superior stability and reliability compared to the classical Fuzzy-TOPSIS method in uncertain environments. The novelty of this study lies in embedding a GA-driven approach within the fuzzy-TOPSIS structure to explicitly address ranking instability under uncertainty in sustainable CLSCs. The study provides significant theoretical contributions by enhancing multi-attribute decision-making regarding disruption risk in sustainable CLSC literature, as well as practical insights for decision-makers to efficiently allocate resources by focusing mitigation investments on consistently high-priority risks instead of low-priority ones.
Suggested Citation
Wogiye Wube & Eshetie Berhan & Gezahegn Tesfaye & Tsega Y. Melesse & Pier Francesco Orrù, 2026.
"Prioritization of Disruptive Risks in Sustainable Closed-Loop Manufacturing Supply Chains,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-28, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1689-:d:1859036
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1689-:d:1859036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.