Author
Listed:
- Buling Xia
(Graduate School, Hanyang University, 222 10th Lane, Gangnam District, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)
- Yaoxi Lei
(Graduate School, Hanyang University, 222 10th Lane, Gangnam District, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)
- Yuexin Hu
(Graduate School, Hanyang University, 222 10th Lane, Gangnam District, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)
- Xuran Zhu
(School of Sociology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
- Jibin Zhang
(School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
Abstract
In light of the rapid adoption of text-to-image (T2I) tools in higher education, this study develops a stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) model to explain the sustainable and responsible use intentions of text-to-image generative AI tools in higher education. Focusing on both university students and faculty, the model conceptualizes perceptions of ease of use, information quality, and ethical awareness as external stimuli; technology- and ethics-related anxiety as internal emotional states; and algorithmic trust, perceived risk, and sustainable use intention as behavioral evaluations and responses. Grounded in the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S–O–R) framework, we integrate the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Technology Threat Avoidance Theory (TTAT), and the DeLone–McLean (D&M) model to propose a layered mechanism, with personal innovativeness serving as a moderator. Utilizing 807 valid survey responses, we employed structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. The results reveal that (1) the overall chain is supported: perceived ease of use, information quality, and ethical awareness primarily influence sustainable use intention indirectly through anxiety, trust, and risk; (2) although higher usability and quality do not alleviate anxiety, they coexist within a complex pattern of trust amid anxiety; and (3) high levels of personal innovativeness diminish the linear effects of trust and risk on intention. Configurational evidence further indicates multiple pathways leading to high sustainable intention, whereas low intention is typically characterized by uniformly low perceptions, emotions, evaluations, and innovativeness. By framing sustainable adoption through a coupled trust–risk–anxiety lens, this study extends the understanding of generative AI use in education and offers actionable implications for promoting responsible and sustainable practices in universities.
Suggested Citation
Buling Xia & Yaoxi Lei & Yuexin Hu & Xuran Zhu & Jibin Zhang, 2026.
"Sustainable Use Intention of Text-to-Image Generative AI in Higher Education: An S–O–R Model with Parallel Trust and Risk Pathways,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-33, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1657-:d:1858392
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1657-:d:1858392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.