IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1652-d1858280.html

Breaking the Urban Carbon Lock-In: The Effects of Heterogeneous Science and Technology Innovation Policies on Urban Carbon Unlocking Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Jingxiu Liu

    (School of Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Min Yao

    (Center for Economic Development Research in Underdeveloped Regions, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Digital technologies such as big data are reshaping resource allocation, raising interest in whether and how heterogeneous science and technology innovation (STI) policies can help unlock urban carbon lock-in. Using panel data for 286 prefecture-level cities in China from 2009 to 2023, this paper examines the relationship between heterogeneous STI policy intensity—classified as supply-side, demand-side, complementary-factor, and institutional-reform policies—and urban carbon unlocking efficiency. We develop a mechanism-based framework and empirically assess (i) the moderating roles of digital infrastructure, science and technology finance, and government green attention, and (ii) spatial spillover effects using spatial econometric models. The results show that all four policy types show a significant positive association with local carbon unlocking efficiency, with institutional-reform policies exhibiting the strongest association. When the four types are included jointly, only supply-side and demand-side policies retain statistically significant direct associations. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that demand-side, complementary-factor, and institutional-reform policies are more strongly associated with efficiency gains in low-pollution cities, whereas supply-side and demand-side policies have a stronger association in high energy-consuming cities. Mechanism analysis reveals that regional digital infrastructure exerts a selective moderating effect on the relationship between heterogeneous sci-tech innovation policies and urban carbon emission reduction efficiency. It positively reinforces the effectiveness of supply-side, demand-side, and institutional reform-oriented policies, while its interaction with complementary policies is statistically insignificant. Technology finance and government green policies function as a “resource catalyst” and an “institutional guarantee” respectively, significantly enhancing the correlation between heterogeneous sci-tech innovation policies and urban carbon emission reduction efficiency. Finally, carbon unlocking efficiency displays significant spatial dependence: the intensity of supply-side and institutional-reform policies is positively associated with carbon unlocking efficiency in neighboring cities, while complementary-factor policies exhibit a negative spatial association. Overall, the findings provide empirical evidence to inform the design and coordination of heterogeneous STI policy portfolios aimed at improving urban carbon unlocking efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingxiu Liu & Min Yao, 2026. "Breaking the Urban Carbon Lock-In: The Effects of Heterogeneous Science and Technology Innovation Policies on Urban Carbon Unlocking Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-45, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1652-:d:1858280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1652/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1652-:d:1858280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.