IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1643-d1858175.html

Infrastructure–Environment Complementarity in African Development: Spatial Thresholds and Economic Returns in Tanzania’s BRI Corridors

Author

Listed:
  • Kizito August Ngowi

    (College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266500, China)

  • Min Ji

    (College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266500, China
    Shandong Engineering Center of Beidou Navigation and Intelligent Spatial Information Technology Application, Qingdao 266500, China)

  • Hanyu Ji

    (College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266500, China)

  • Zequn Liu

    (College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266500, China)

  • Pengfei Song

    (College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266500, China)

Abstract

Conventional infrastructure appraisal in Africa prioritizes short-term economic performance while insufficiently accounting for the environmental conditions that govern long-term sustainability, spatial equity, and development resilience. To address this gap, this study develops an explicitly SDG-oriented spatial–ecological framework to examine how environmental quality conditions the economic returns of large-scale infrastructure investments under corridor-based development. The primary objective is to quantify infrastructure–environment complementarity and identify ecological thresholds regulating spatial spillovers and investment effectiveness along Tanzania’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) corridors. High-resolution remote sensing and spatially explicit socioeconomic data for 2012–2023 are integrated within a spatial econometric design. A Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) incorporating the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is estimated to capture non-linear interaction effects, with economic activity proxied by Night-Time Light (NTL) intensity across 2680 corridor grid cells. The results identify a statistically robust ecological threshold at NDVI = −0.8σ, beyond which infrastructure investments shift from low to high economic effectiveness. A strong positive infrastructure–environment interaction (β = 6.44, p < 0.001) indicates that environmental quality functions as a productive modulating factor rather than a passive constraint. Spatial classification shows that 63% of corridor areas are investment-ready, while 15% require ecological restoration prior to effective infrastructure deployment. Although institutional quality and long-term post-construction dynamics are not explicitly modeled, the framework provides a replicable and policy-relevant decision-support tool, offering actionable guidance for aligning corridor development with SDGs 9, 11, and 13 and advancing sustainable infrastructure planning in the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Kizito August Ngowi & Min Ji & Hanyu Ji & Zequn Liu & Pengfei Song, 2026. "Infrastructure–Environment Complementarity in African Development: Spatial Thresholds and Economic Returns in Tanzania’s BRI Corridors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1643-:d:1858175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1643-:d:1858175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.