IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1622-d1857871.html

Evaluating Heap Composting as a Low-Input Alternative to Aerobic Turning for Manure Stabilization

Author

Listed:
  • Min Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China)

  • Hao Fan

    (Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
    College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yabin Zhan

    (Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China)

  • Jingang Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China)

  • Ran Yu

    (Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
    College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yunfeng Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China)

Abstract

Livestock and poultry manure is an important recyclable nutrient resource in Chinese agriculture, and heap composting, a low-input static method, is the most common treatment approach on farms. However, most studies have focused on aerobic composting, whereas systematic evaluations of physicochemical evolution and maturity/quality development during heap composting remain limited, hampering reliable assessment of compost performance and land-application readiness. Here, we compared heap and turned composting of chicken manure amended with rice bran under natural aeration. Five treatments were applied: manure alone (CM), manure with rice bran (CM+RB), covered heap compost (CM+RB+C), single-turned compost (CM+RB+ST), and multi-turned compost (CM+RB+MT), monitored for 66 days. Rice-bran addition rapidly induced the thermophilic phase and substantially enhanced organic decomposition, while turning further prolonged the thermophilic phase. Humic acid content increased in all rice-bran treatments, indicating clear humification, with only slight variation among aeration intensities. Nitrogen transformation also differed: turned piles showed faster nitrification, suggesting enhanced aerobic nitrogen conversion under stronger aeration. Compost maturity improved across treatments, and all rice-bran treatments except CM+RB+C achieved a germination index > 70%. Overall, heap composting largely achieved stability, humification, and maturity close to those of aerobic turning, while markedly reducing labor and energy inputs, supporting its suitability for small-scale manure recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Xu & Hao Fan & Yabin Zhan & Jingang Xu & Ran Yu & Yunfeng Chen, 2026. "Evaluating Heap Composting as a Low-Input Alternative to Aerobic Turning for Manure Stabilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1622-:d:1857871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1622-:d:1857871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.