Author
Listed:
- Zhisen Zhang
(School of Economics & Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Qian Hu
(School of Economics & Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Haiyan Wang
(School of Economics & Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
Abstract
Logistics alliance and integrated passenger-freight transit are two widely adopted collaborative logistics modes in rural areas. With the rapid development of agricultural e-commerce, rural “first-mile” logistics has become critical for agricultural products’ upward circulation, but remains constrained by high costs and insufficient service provision. Existing studies mainly focus on a single transportation mode and pay limited attention to logistics service providers’ strategic choice among alternative modes under government intervention. Using a Stackelberg game framework, this study models the interaction among the government, a logistics service provider, and a rural bus company, and analyzes transportation mode choice and subsidy effectiveness. The results show that government subsidies improve rural “first-mile” logistics service levels and stimulate demand for cargo collection services. Transportation mode choice is jointly influenced by market share, service cost coefficient, and subsidy intensity. Large-scale logistics service providers tend to adopt the integrated passenger-freight transit mode when subsidies are insufficient, and prefer the logistics alliance mode when subsidy support becomes adequate. These findings suggest that subsidy policies should consider fiscal capacity and regional operating costs: the integrated passenger-freight transit is more suitable under limited budgets, while the logistics alliance becomes preferable for promoting regional logistics development when sufficient subsidies can be sustained.
Suggested Citation
Zhisen Zhang & Qian Hu & Haiyan Wang, 2026.
"Collaborative Transportation Strategies for the “First-Mile” of Agricultural Product Upward Logistics Under Government Subsidies,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1602-:d:1857395
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1602-:d:1857395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.