Author
Listed:
- Minh-Tai Le
(Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City 71307, Vietnam)
- Thuy-Duong Thi Pham
(Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City 71307, Vietnam)
Abstract
This paper proposes a two-stage framework integrating Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods to evaluate the performance of logistics firms in Vietnam. In the first stage, DEA models (CCR, BCC, and SBM) are employed to measure relative efficiency and identify benchmark firms among 15 leading logistics companies. In the second stage, FAHP–FTOPSIS is used to incorporate qualitative and sustainability-oriented criteria and to provide a comprehensive ranking of the efficient firms. The results indicate that a considerable proportion of firms operate below the efficiency frontier, implying substantial opportunities for resource optimization. Environmental and technological dimensions are found to be the most influential factors, while companies implementing green distribution strategies and strong data security practices consistently achieve higher rankings. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness and stability of the proposed framework. This study contributes by bridging operational efficiency assessment with broader strategic and sustainability considerations, overcoming the limitations of single-method evaluations used in prior research. The integrated DEA–FAHP–FTOPSIS approach offers managers a practical tool to diagnose weaknesses, prioritize improvement actions, and benchmark against top performers. In addition, it offers policymakers valuable insights to support digital transformation and green logistics initiatives in developing economy contexts.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1594-:d:1857363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.