IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1560-d1856512.html

Protected Area Soils as Natural Laboratories: Topographic Controls on Soil Carbon Storage and Nutrient Stoichiometry for Sustainable Ecosystem Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ahu Alev Abacı Bayar

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir 40100, Türkiye)

Abstract

There are 266 nature parks in Türkiye, including Aşıkpaşa Nature Park, covering a total area of approximately 109,023 ha; however, information regarding soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS), soil nitrogen stocks (NS), and nutrient stoichiometry in these protected forests remains limited. This study evaluates the influence of tree species, altitude, aspect, and soil depth on nutrient stocks and stoichiometry using a 3 × 2 × 3 × 3 factorial experimental design. The findings indicate that mixed stands (Black Pine + Cedar) significantly optimize nutrient storage, reaching peak N (3.531 ± 0.115 t ha −1 ) and P (0.948 ± 0.016 t ha −1 ) stocks. SOC and N stocks reached 66.34 ± 1.86 t ha −1 and 4.032 ± 0.123 t ha −1 , respectively, along the altitudinal gradient. Soil pH exhibited a steady rise with altitude (from 7.86 to 8.15), contrary to typical leaching patterns, while bulk density varied depending on Altitude × Aspect × Depth interactions. Stoichiometric analyses revealed that Cedar stands maintain higher C:K ratios (3.457 ± 0.258), reflecting superior nutrient use efficiency. Furthermore, sunny aspects prioritized nitrogen mineralization (N:P ratio: 4.540), whereas shaded aspects facilitated phosphorus retention. These results prove that soil fertility and carbon sequestration are modulated by complex topographic–biotic interactions, suggesting that preserving mixed forest structures is of vital importance for ecological sustainability and forest resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahu Alev Abacı Bayar, 2026. "Protected Area Soils as Natural Laboratories: Topographic Controls on Soil Carbon Storage and Nutrient Stoichiometry for Sustainable Ecosystem Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1560-:d:1856512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1560-:d:1856512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.