Author
Listed:
- Xiao Qin
(School of Business, Nanjing University of Science and Technology ZiJin College, Nanjing 210023, China)
- Zifeng Wang
(School of Business, Nanjing University of Science and Technology ZiJin College, Nanjing 210023, China)
- Yanju Liang
(School of Business, Nanjing University of Science and Technology ZiJin College, Nanjing 210023, China)
- Yuan Virtanen
(School of Intelligent Finance and Business, Entrepreneur College (Taicang), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215400, China)
Abstract
As global climate change intensifies and the Paris Agreement advances low-carbon transformation, frequent local policy adjustments under China’s dual carbon goals have made climate-policy uncertainty a core challenge for corporate sustainability. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has grown exponentially in international capital markets, evolving from a peripheral concept to a key investment decision-making dimension. This study uses China’s carbon peaking and neutrality policies as a quasinatural experiment, applying the difference-in-differences (DID) method to the panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies (2014–2023). Taking high-energy-consuming enterprises as the treatment group, this study identifies net policy effects via the interaction of policy and time dummy variables. The results show that carbon peaking and neutrality policies significantly suppress the ESG performance of energy-intensive firms; mediating effect tests confirm that the policy harms ESG performance by increasing uncertainty. Implications include enhancing policy transparency and predictability and optimizing resource allocation to strengthen ESG resilience. Future research should focus on micro-level policy indicators and long-term effect tracking to provide theoretical and practical support for synergizing dual carbon goals with high-quality economic development.
Suggested Citation
Xiao Qin & Zifeng Wang & Yanju Liang & Yuan Virtanen, 2026.
"How Does Climate Policy Uncertainty Affect Corporate Sustainability? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-27, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1554-:d:1856406
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1554-:d:1856406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.