IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1539-d1856077.html

How Green Skepticism Undermines Green Purchase Intention: The Roles of Information Seeking and Anticipated Guilt

Author

Listed:
  • Shengyi Zhou

    (Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 730-0053, Japan)

  • Eunji Seo

    (Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 730-0053, Japan)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the transition toward a sustainable society, the green product market has expanded steadily. However, green skepticism poses a significant challenge to promoting sustainable consumption. This study develops a parallel mediation model to examine how green skepticism influences green purchase intention through information seeking and anticipated guilt among Chinese consumers. Survey data were collected from 511 Chinese respondents and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with IBM SPSS AMOS 30. While prior research typically assumes a direct negative effect of skepticism on green purchase intention, our results show that green skepticism does not exert a significant direct effect on green purchase intention. Instead, green skepticism indirectly undermines green purchase intention by reducing consumers’ motivation to seek green product information and weakening anticipated guilt. These findings challenge the prevailing “skepticism-as-verification” view and suggest that green skepticism may foster information avoidance and moral disengagement rather than deeper cognitive and moral engagement. By identifying these disengagement pathways, this study helps clarify previously mixed findings on the relationship between green skepticism and green purchase intention. It delineates important boundary conditions for the effectiveness of green marketing and policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shengyi Zhou & Eunji Seo, 2026. "How Green Skepticism Undermines Green Purchase Intention: The Roles of Information Seeking and Anticipated Guilt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-31, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1539-:d:1856077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1539-:d:1856077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.