Author
Listed:
- Denis dos Santos Alves
(Department of Science and Technology Policy (Unicamp), CEUCI-Unicamp, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-862, Brazil)
- Milena Pavan Serafim
(Laboratory of Public Sector Studies, School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, Limeira 13484-350, Brazil)
- Marcela Noronha
(School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, CEUCI-Unicamp, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-862, Brazil)
- Silvia Stuchi
(Laboratory of Public Sector Studies, School of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, Limeira 13484-350, Brazil)
- Milena Eugênio da Silva
(Department of Science and Technology Policy (Unicamp), CEUCI-Unicamp, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-862, Brazil)
- Iara Goncalves dos Santos
(School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, CEUCI-Unicamp, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-862, Brazil)
- Camila Bulus
(CEUR-Centro de Estudios Urbanos Y Regionales, Saavedra 15, Buenos Aires C1083ACA, Argentina)
- Luciana Guido
(CEUR-Centro de Estudios Urbanos Y Regionales, Saavedra 15, Buenos Aires C1083ACA, Argentina)
- Mariana Versino
(CEUR-Centro de Estudios Urbanos Y Regionales, Saavedra 15, Buenos Aires C1083ACA, Argentina)
- Gabriela Celani
(School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Design, CEUCI-Unicamp, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-862, Brazil)
Abstract
In recent decades, governments have invested in strategic territories focused on knowledge production and application, which are strategic for socioeconomic development, particularly in urban areas. However, conceptual and terminological diversity hinders aspects such as the systematization of the literature, the advance of theoretical conceptualizations, and the formulation of coherent policies, especially in the context of socioenvironmental challenges. In this study, with the aim of consolidating this literature, we have conducted a systematic review with bibliometric and content analysis, examining publications on eight denominations associated with these territories. The literature reveals the existence of an established field; nonetheless, themes and denominations are still dispersed in the corpus. Among 400 authors, 339 published a single article, and only 13 authors have three or more studies in the sample. We identified a core of 11 journals that concentrate 73 of the 214 analyzed texts. We propose the term “knowledge territories” as an umbrella concept. A total of 114 case studies were identified. Governance is the most recurrent dimension (53% of the texts). Topics such as climate change, food production and diffuse effects of territorial occupation are rarely explored, as are the cases analyzed in the context of semi-peripheral and peripheral countries, indicating gaps and opportunities for future research.
Suggested Citation
Denis dos Santos Alves & Milena Pavan Serafim & Marcela Noronha & Silvia Stuchi & Milena Eugênio da Silva & Iara Goncalves dos Santos & Camila Bulus & Luciana Guido & Mariana Versino & Gabriela Celani, 2026.
"Knowledge Territories: Conclusions from a Systematic Literature Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-46, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1504-:d:1855500
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1504-:d:1855500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.