Author
Listed:
- Shiyin Wen
(Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
Hebei Geological Environment Monitoring Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
School of Water Resources and Enviroment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
- Jianhui Fan
(Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
Hebei Geological Environment Monitoring Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China)
- Guoxing Pang
(Hebei Key Laboratory of Geological Resources and Environment Monitoring and Protection, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
Hebei Geological Environment Monitoring Institute, Shijiazhuang 050000, China)
Abstract
In response to the requirements for groundwater pollution risk identification and zoning-based management in typical coastal industrial agglomeration areas, this study takes the coastal industrial zone of the Jidong Plain as the research area and. It develops an integrated evaluation framework for groundwater pollution prevention zoning. The framework is quantitatively centered on pollution source load assessment and groundwater vulnerability analysis, and applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) solely as an interpretative and decision-support tool. In this study, the Linear Weighted Function (LWF) method and the DRASTIC model are employed to quantitatively characterize pollution source load intensity (PI) and groundwater system vulnerability (DI), respectively. By constructing a prevention and control index (R) in the form of the product of pollution source load and groundwater vulnerability, the framework achieves an integrated representation of pollution input intensity and the carrying capacity of the groundwater system. The AHP is not directly involved in indicator weighting or zoning calculations; instead, it is applied as a post hoc analytical approach to identify the relative importance of different evaluation factors in groundwater pollution prevention zoning, thereby supporting the interpretation of the zoning results and management priority setting. The results indicate that the overall pollution source load in the study area is relatively low, with low-to-moderately low load zones accounting for 68.7% of the area. In comparison, high-load zones account for only 1.43% and are mainly concentrated in the southeastern coastal industrial belt. Shallow groundwater generally exhibits high vulnerability, with highly vulnerable zones covering 86.56% of the area and predominantly distributed in the northeastern Quaternary unconsolidated sedimentary regions. Based on the prevention and control index (R), the study area is classified into prevention zones and remediation zones. Prevention zones account for 94.47% of the total area, whereas remediation zones account for 5.53%. High-risk areas are mainly concentrated in coastal industrial belts and highly vulnerable cultivated areas. The results demonstrate that the proposed integrated evaluation framework effectively couples pollution source load and groundwater vulnerability, and, on the basis of the finalized zoning results, enhances the interpretability and management specificity of the zoning outcomes through post hoc decision-support analysis, thereby providing a scientific basis and methodological reference for groundwater pollution prevention zoning and differentiated management in coastal industrial regions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1488-:d:1855241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.