IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1483-d1855118.html

Comparative TEA–LCA of CHP, Biomethane, and Hybrid Biogas Utilization Pathways for Poultry Manure with Fruit and Vegetable Waste Co-Digestion Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ayandeji Sunday Ayantokun

    (Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

  • Olalekan Joseph Ogunniyi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa)

  • Tonderayi Syvester Matambo

    (Centre of Competence in Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Environmental Science, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa
    The Bioenergy Consortium, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa)

  • Ismari Van der Merwe

    (Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

  • Charles Rashama

    (Centre of Competence in Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Environmental Science, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa
    The Bioenergy Consortium, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa
    Department of Life and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa)

  • Johan Adam Van Niekerk

    (Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of organic waste offers renewable energy and waste-management benefits, relevant to multiple SDGs. This study evaluates a proposed 50 t/d farm-based biogas plant co-digesting poultry manure (PM) and fruit/vegetable waste (FVW) in South Africa. Five substrate blends (100% PM, 100% FVW, and three PM–FVW mixtures) and three biogas utilization routes (100% electricity via a combined heat and power (CHP) system, 50/50 CHP–biomethane, and 100% biomethane) were modelled in a combined techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework. Key metrics included GWP100 per ton of feedstock and the project’s internal rate of return (IRR), debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), and net present value (NPV) over a 20-year project lifespan. Under base-case assumptions, electricity-led pathways yield the highest returns; in the best case, 80% FVW + 20% PM with 100% CHP achieves a project IRR of 10% with a minimum DSCR of 2.4. The LCA shows total GWP100 ranging 118–168 kgCO 2 -eq/t, minimum for pure FVW, maximum for pure PM, and clearly identifies digestate handling as the dominant emission source. Overall, the CHP-only configuration emerges as the most financeable option at this scale, and emphasis on closed digestate management is recommended to minimize emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayandeji Sunday Ayantokun & Olalekan Joseph Ogunniyi & Tonderayi Syvester Matambo & Ismari Van der Merwe & Charles Rashama & Johan Adam Van Niekerk, 2026. "Comparative TEA–LCA of CHP, Biomethane, and Hybrid Biogas Utilization Pathways for Poultry Manure with Fruit and Vegetable Waste Co-Digestion Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1483-:d:1855118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1483-:d:1855118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.