IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1446-d1854063.html

Carbon Emission Assessment and Reduction Pathways of Teaching and Research Equipment in Application-Oriented University in China Based on Life-Cycle Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kuihua Lin

    (Office of Asset Management, Putian University, Putian 351100, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiawei Huang

    (Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Fujian Academy of Environmental Sciences, Fuzhou 350011, China
    College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350100, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Bingqi Jiang

    (Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Fujian Academy of Environmental Sciences, Fuzhou 350011, China)

  • Changlin Cao

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350100, China
    Green Recycling of Ministry of Education Fujian Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

  • Qingrong Qian

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350100, China
    Green Recycling of Ministry of Education Fujian Key Laboratory of Pollution Control & Resource Reuse, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350100, China)

Abstract

In this study, 7647 scrapped pieces of teaching and research equipment (T&R equipment) in an application-oriented university in China in 2024 were employed to assess their carbon emissions using lifecycle analysis. A lifecycle accounting framework was established based on expenditure–environmental expansion input–output (EEIO) models, and the greenhouse gas emissions across the producing, using, and scrapping stages of the T&R equipment at this type of university were estimated. Carbon emission reduction pathways for T&R equipment at this type of university were proposed. It is clear that the lifecycle emissions of the scrapped equipment at this type of university equal 8350.8 tCO 2 , including producing, using, and scrapping stage emissions of 2277.9 tCO 2 , 5848.9 tCO 2, and 223.9 tCO 2 , respectively. It is noted that the producing stage accounts for the dominant contributor to carbon emissions, with 70.0% of the total amount. In view of subcategory emissions, information technology equipment (A0201) contributes the most emissions, with 18.0% during the producing and scrapping stages, whereas instruments (A0210) and electrical/electronic production equipment (A0233) contribute the most, with 21.4% and 15.7%, in the using stage. The results of scenario analysis show that, for most equipment, total carbon emissions can be reduced by about 233 tCO 2 /a on average if scrapped one year in advance. However, for information technology equipment (A0201), emissions increase by 48 tCO 2 /a. This method offers comparability and replicability in scenarios lacking physical measurements, providing quantitative evidence and carbon reduction pathways for green procurement, asset renewal, and end-of-life recycling in higher education institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuihua Lin & Jiawei Huang & Bingqi Jiang & Changlin Cao & Qingrong Qian, 2026. "Carbon Emission Assessment and Reduction Pathways of Teaching and Research Equipment in Application-Oriented University in China Based on Life-Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1446-:d:1854063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1446/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1446/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1446-:d:1854063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.