Environmental and Economic Analysis of Repurposed Wind Turbine Blades for Recreational Trail Bridges

A two-parameter environmental (measured in CO2eq—CO 2 is used in this paper to represent the carbon dioxide molecule as opposed to the chemical formula CO 2 as is common practice in LCA studies; CO2eq is an abbreviation for CO 2 equivalent and may be written as CO2e in the literature) and economic (measured in USD) analysis using life cycle analysis (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) of repurposed wind turbine blades for structural use in recreational trail bridges (e.g., on hiking trails and golf courses) is described in this paper. The US Department of Energy’s TECHTEST TEA/LCA software (v1.0) platform was used to compare three commercially available trail bridges (a steel truss bridge, an FRP pultruded truss bridge, and a glulam stringer bridge) with a bridge made from retired wind turbine blades (known as a BladeBridge). All bridges had a 50 ft (15.24 m) long by 6 ft (1.83 m) wide deck and were designed for a 90 psf (4.3 kN/m 2 ) live load. The LCA functional unit was the assembled bridge, which was made ready to be shipped from the fabricator. Cradle-to-gate (A1–A3, i.e., raw material extraction, transportation, and manufacturing) system boundaries were used. For the BladeBridge, no embodied carbon was attributed to the blade itself (cut-off system allocation). For the TEA, a USD 660/tonne credit was attributed to the blade. The raw materials for each bridge were determined from detailed construction documents. Manufacturing and transportation energy were determined based on the equipment used for fabrication and geographical location. Direct labor for fabrication was calculated based on a weighted average of salaries taken from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. The results indicate that raw materials had the biggest effect on embodied CO2eq and that labor had the largest impact on cost for all bridges. The results indicate that the BladeBridge is significantly less expensive to produce and releases less CO2eq into the environment (less Global Warming Potential (GWP)) than the three commercially available bridges. Additional TEA metrics for the BladeBridge, including Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and future market potential, were also evaluated and found to be positive for the BladeBridge technology.