Author
Listed:
- Rhea Lee Shia Goh
(Marketing Section, Economics and Business Faculty, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15953 Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Andrea Weihrauch
(Marketing Section, Economics and Business Faculty, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15953 Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
- Willemijn van Dolen
(Marketing Section, Economics and Business Faculty, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15953 Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
Abstract
As sustainability marketing research advances, conceptual debates persist regarding relevant stakeholders, motivations, and the integration of sustainability into marketing. However, these debates are not always consistently reflected in empirical work. Given the urgency of sustainability, a unifying framework is crucial to synthesize four decades of research. We aim to provide a durable framework to ensure that critical research progresses efficiently by supporting meaningful knowledge generation in sustainability marketing research. We conduct a scoping review of 48 conceptual articles, resulting in the A-VO-S Map. Its three dimensions are: Actors (Consumers, Businesses, Institutions), Value Orientations (Self-, Societally-, and Environmentally-Oriented), and Scope of Sustainability (Peripheral to Central). We then present an evidence map of empirical sustainability marketing research based on a content analysis of 191 empirical articles from 19 top journals. Findings reveal that Consumers are overrepresented, Societal-Orientation lacks supporting evidence, and sustainability is studied with a Moderate Scope. We conclude the paper with a practitioner-informed research agenda and an interactive version of our evidence map. Thus, we offer unique contributions over prior reviews through a meta-framework that functions as an evidence map, with high valorization potential due to its interactive tool and practitioner-informed perspectives.
Suggested Citation
Rhea Lee Shia Goh & Andrea Weihrauch & Willemijn van Dolen, 2026.
"The A-VO-S Map for Sustainability Marketing: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-30, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1428-:d:1853623
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1428-:d:1853623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.