Author
Listed:
- Hui Peng
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
- Zhao Zhang
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
- Zhibin Tao
(School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, UK)
Abstract
Amid profound transformations in the global political and economic landscape and increasingly stringent resource and environmental constraints, enhancing corporate competitiveness under high uncertainty and achieving sustainable development have become core challenges for firms. Based on data from Chinese A-share listed companies during 2013–2024, this study constructs a corporate sustainable development indicator system under the triple bottom line framework and measures it using the entropy method. Meanwhile, the Supply Chain Innovation and Application Pilot policy is treated as a quasi-natural experiment, and a Staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) model is employed to systematically examine the impact of supply chain innovation on corporate sustainable development. The results indicate that supply chain innovation significantly enhances firms’ sustainable development performance, and this finding remains robust across a series of robustness checks. Mechanism analysis shows that the policy effect primarily operates through two channels: relational effects and informational effects. On the one hand, supply chain innovation strengthens collaboration and trust between firms and their upstream and downstream partners, improving supply chain stability and overall operational efficiency. On the other hand, it promotes information sharing and digital coordination, alleviates information asymmetry, and optimizes resource allocation, thereby boosting corporate sustainability. Further heterogeneity analysis reveals that the policy effect is more pronounced in firms with higher levels of digitalization and weaker market pricing power, in upstream segments of the value chain, in industries with higher warehousing and transportation costs and lower market competition, and in regions with more advanced digital infrastructure and relatively richer resource endowments.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1358-:d:1851691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.