IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1356-d1851624.html

Toward Sustainable Supply Chains in Metal Additive Manufacturing: An Energy-Based Limited-Scope Global Warming Potential (GWP) Life Cycle Assessment of Oxygen-Free High Conductivity Copper Powder Production

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Sherwin

    (Palumbo-Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA)

  • John Barnes

    (Metal Powder Works, Clinton, PA 15026, USA)

  • Eric Rhodes

    (Metal Powder Works, Clinton, PA 15026, USA)

Abstract

Powder metallurgy processes manufacture products from metal powders, which can be produced using various methods. When customer requirements permit, powder metal processes can produce products in an additive rather than a subtractive fashion. Thus, this approach reduces the waste associated with traditional subtractive metallurgical forming processes such as machining. In addition to lowering material waste, enhancing design flexibility, and improving process efficiency, additive manufacturing of powder metallurgy products can also reduce environmental impact by reducing energy consumption, raw material use, emissions, transportation, and waste generation. Furthermore, the use of alternative methods for manufacturing metal powders can further reduce environmental impact. In this study, an energy-based limited-scope global warming potential life cycle assessment is presented that compares the carbon intensities of manufacturing critical products made of oxygen-free high-conductivity copper powder via two different powder production routes: electrode induction melting gas atomization, and the DirectPowder TM System, within additive manufacturing supply chains. Instead of relying on single-point estimates, this study uses a Monte Carlo simulation to account for uncertainty and variation in input data. Results indicated that the DirectPowder TM manufacturing pathway had a 39.4% lower global warming potential per kg of usable powder when parts were manufactured via laser powder bed fusion. When only the powder manufacturing methods were included in the analysis, the DirectPowder TM method demonstrated the potential to reduce global warming impact by 92.9% when compared to the electrode induction melting gas atomization process. In total, 11.44 kg CO 2 -eq per kg of OFHC copper produced is saved when using the DirectPowder TM process. This research provides new insights into the tradeoffs between the environmental impact and functional capabilities of these methods. It offers valuable guidance on process selection for product designers and supply chain professionals seeking to optimize product performance, energy use, and environmental footprint.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Sherwin & John Barnes & Eric Rhodes, 2026. "Toward Sustainable Supply Chains in Metal Additive Manufacturing: An Energy-Based Limited-Scope Global Warming Potential (GWP) Life Cycle Assessment of Oxygen-Free High Conductivity Copper Powder Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1356-:d:1851624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1356/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1356/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1356-:d:1851624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.