IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i3p1312-d1850731.html

From Improvement to Rebound: Evolution Trajectory, Turning Point, and Dominant Factors of Desertification Sensitivity in Ordos over the Past 25 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Meijuan Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Qin Qiao

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Wenting Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Guomei Shao

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Yongwei Han

    (State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

Abstract

The prevention and control of desertification in northern China is currently in a critical stage of transitioning from large-scale governance to precise adaptation. Identifying potential risk areas during the ecological restoration process is a scientific prerequisite for achieving long-term governance. This study focuses on the typical ecologically fragile area of Ordos City, where high-resolution grazing pressure grid data and a night-time light index were innovatively integrated into the assessment system to develop a desertification sensitivity evaluation framework that couples climatic, vegetative, soil, and human activity (CVSH) factors. Compared to linear models, the CVSH framework enhances dynamic assessment accuracy by coupling human activity indicators, particularly addressing the policy lag effect inherent in PSR models. The study systematically tracked the temporal and spatial differentiation process of desertification sensitivity from 2000 to 2024, finding that the spatial pattern shows a significant “the west is high while the east is low” concentration, and the time series has experienced a phased turning point of “first suppression then growth”. Mechanism analysis indicates that climate aridification and vegetation degradation are the dominant stress factors, while intense human activities have significantly exacerbated the vulnerability of local ecosystems through nonlinear interactions, leading to the re-expansion of high-sensitivity zones after 2018, with their area proportion increasing sharply from 15.52% to 30.07%. This study reveals the fragility of ecological engineering effectiveness and the complexity of risk evolution under the combined influence of climate fluctuations and human interference, providing a direct scientific picture and decision support for achieving differentiated ecological risk management and sustainable land management in different regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Meijuan Zhang & Qin Qiao & Wenting Zhang & Guomei Shao & Yongwei Han, 2026. "From Improvement to Rebound: Evolution Trajectory, Turning Point, and Dominant Factors of Desertification Sensitivity in Ordos over the Past 25 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1312-:d:1850731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1312-:d:1850731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.