Author
Listed:
- Yong Lei
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)
- Jie Cui
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)
- Shuai Li
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)
- Feng Tian
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)
- Lu Tian
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)
- Zeliang Du
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)
- Mengyue Wen
(Shanxi Provincial Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Taiyuan 030021, China)
- Binghua Yan
(Development Center of Natural Resources of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030021, China)
- Tongtong Jiao
(Changzhi Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources, Changzhi 046000, China)
- Yang Zhang
(School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
Objective: Given the global trend of ecological protection and sustainable development, Global Geoparks have become an essential platform for resource conservation and regional growth. Changzhi City in Shanxi Province, China, is actively applying for Global Geopark status, relying on its rich geoheritage sites, cultural history, and natural landscapes. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of the city’s geodiversity and relic value, analyzes the feasibility of establishing a Global Geopark in Changzhi City, and provides scientific support for Changzhi City’s Global Geopark application. Methods: Geodiversity data were collected by region using a 1:25,000 grid for sampling. Four methods were adopted for evaluation, namely, the Shannon diversity index, Simpson diversity index, entropy weight method (EWM), and Pielou evenness index. Upon comprehensive comparison of the four approaches, the most suitable approach was selected to produce the final results. For the value evaluation of the geoheritage, a combination of the analytic hierarchy process and the entropy weight method was employed. Results: (1) According to the results of all four methods, the geodiversity of Changzhi City is higher in the eastern and western regions and lower in the central area. (2) The geoheritage sites are mainly distributed in the eastern part of the city and have relatively high relic value. (3) Changzhi City contains abundant natural reserves and cultural resources, meeting the fundamental requirements for Global Geopark construction. Specifically, 38 townships across eight counties were identified as potential geopark areas, encompassing 54 geoheritage sites, 76 provincial-level or higher cultural-relic protection sites, and 15 provincial-level or higher natural protected areas, with a total area of 4458.51 km 2 . Conclusions: Our results suggest that the Shannon diversity index is an effective tool for evaluating geodiversity in Changzhi City. Based on the region’s geological and natural conditions, the delineated geopark area is feasible. In summary, our findings provide essential references for the protection and sustainable development of geoheritage sites, geodiversity, and geoparks and offer strong theoretical and data support for Changzhi City’s Global Geopark application.
Suggested Citation
Yong Lei & Jie Cui & Shuai Li & Feng Tian & Lu Tian & Zeliang Du & Mengyue Wen & Binghua Yan & Tongtong Jiao & Yang Zhang, 2026.
"Geodiversity Assessment and Global Geopark Construction in Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-32, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1252-:d:1849270
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:1252-:d:1849270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.